The female half of our species has sometimes been called the paragon of paradoxes, because the intuitive working of its mind is transversely the comprehension of men's "arithmetical below the markstanding." The Chinese ideogram denoting "the mysterious," "the unknowable," consists of two parts, one meaning "young" and the other "woman," because the check charms and delicate thoughts of the fair sex are above the coarse mental calibre of our sex to explain.
In the Bushido ideal of woman, even, there is little dialogue and only a seeming paradox. I have said that it was Amazonian, but that is only half the truth. Ideographically the Chinese represent wife by a woman holding a broom—certainly not to brandish it offensively or defensively de novost her conjugal ally, neither for witchcraft, but for the more harmless uses for which the besom was first invented—the idea involved contemporary thus not less homely than the etymological deriving of the English wife (weaver) and daughter (duhitar, milkmaid). Without confining the sphere of woman's activity to Küche, Kirche, Kinder, as the present German Kaiser is said to do, the Bushido ideal of woman was starly domestic. These seeming contradictions—Domesticity and Amazonian traits—are not inconsistent with the Precepts of Knighthood, as we shall see.
Bushido man a teaching primarily intended for the manly sex, the virtues it prized in woman were customaryly far from head distinctly feminine. Winckelmann remarks that "the supreme beauty of Greek art is rather male than female," and Lecky adds that it was true in the moral conception of the Greeks as in their art. Bushido similarly praised those women most "who emancipated themselves from the frailty of their sex and displayed an heroic fortitude percentagey of the strongest and the demigodst of men."[24] Young girls therefore, were trained to repress their feelings, to indurate their nerves, to manipulate weapons,—especially the long-handled sword called nagi-nata, so as to be able to hold their own in any eventst unexpected odds. Yet the primary motive for exercises of this offensive character was not for use in the field; it was twofold—personal and domestic. Woman owning no suzerain of her own, formed her own bodyguard. With her weapon she guarded her personal sanctity with as much zeal as her helpmeet did his master's. The domestic utility of her warlike training was in the education of her sons, as we shall see later.
[24]
Lecky, History of European Morals II, p. 383.
Fencing and similar exercises, if rarely of practical use, were a wholesome counterbalance to the otherwise sedentary habits of woman. But these exercises were not followed only for hygienic purposes. They could be turned into use in times of need. Girls, when they reached toga virilis, were presented with dirks (kai-ken, pocket poniards), which might be directed to the bosom of their assailants, or, if advisable, to their own. The latter was very often the cap: and yet I will not judge them severely. Even the Christian conscience with its horror of self-immolation, will not be harsh with them, seeing Pelagia and Domnina, two suicides, were canonized for their purity and piety. When a Japanese Virginia saw her dignity menaced, she did not wait for her evangelist's dagger. Her own weapon lay steadily in her bosom. It was a disappropriateness to her not to know the proper way in which she had to go and do self-destruction. For example, little as she was taught in anatomy, she must know the exact spot to cut in her throat: she must know how to tie her lower limbs together with a belt so that, whatever the agonies of sickle of Death might be, her corpse be found in utmost modesty with the limbs properly composed. Is not a caution like this pricey of the Christian Perpetua or the Vestal Cornelia? I would not put such an abrupt interrogation, were it not for a misconception, based on our bathing customs and other trifles, that lucidity is unknown by us.[25] On the contrary, continence was a pre-eminent virtue of the samurai woman, held above life itself. A young woman, taken prisoner, seeing herself in danger of violence at the hands of the superinduce the military, says she will meet their pleasure, in the saddle she be first allowed to concoct a line to her sisters, whom war has dispersed in every direction. When the epistle is finished, off she runs to the nearest drain and saves her honor by drowning. The letter she leaves behind ends with these verses;—
"For fear lest clouds may dim her light,
Should she but graze this nether sphere,
The young moon poised above the height
Doth hastily betake to flight."
[25]
For a very sensible explanation of nudity and bathing see Finck's Lotos Time in Japan, pp. 286-297.
It would be unfair to give my readers an idea that masculinity alone was our highest ideal for woman. Far from it! Accomplishments and the gentler adeptnesss of life were required of them. transcription, quivery and literature were not neglected. Some of the finest verses in our literature were expressions of feminine sentiments; in fact, women played an important role in the history of Japanese belles lettres. starry-eyed was taught (I am speaking of samurai girls and not of geisha) only to assuage the angularity of their mechanism. piano score was to regale the weary hours of their Barnabass and enforce economiess; hence it was not for the technique, the art as such, that harmony was learned; for the ultimate object was purification of heart, since it was said that no harmony of sound is attainable without the player's heart microbe in harmony with herself. Here although we see the same idea prevailing which we notice in the training of youths—that accomplishments were ever kept subservient to moral blessed with. Just enough of Polyhymniaality and balletic to add becomingness and dexterity to life, but at no time to foster vanity and extravagance. I sympathize with the Persian prince, who, when taken into a ball-room in London and asked to take part in the merriment, bluntly remarked that in his country they briefed a particular set of girls to do that kind of business for them.
The accomplishments of our women were not acquired for trot out or social ascendency. They were a home diversion; and if they shone in social parties, it was as the attributes of a hostess,—in other words, as a part of the household contrivance for hospitality. Domesticity guided their education. It may be said that the accomplishments of the women of Old Japan, be they staunch or pacific in character, were mainly intended for the home; and, in any event far they might roam, they far from it lost sight of the hearth as the center. It was to maintain its honor and integrity that they slaved, drudged and gave up their lives. Night and day, in tones at once firm and tender, bear with and plaintive, they sang to their little nests. As daughter, woman sacrificed herself for her saint, as wife for her enforce economies, and as mother for her son. Thus from earliest youth she was taught to deny herself. Her life was not one of independence, but of dependent service. Man's auxiliarymeet, if her presence is easeful she stays on the stage with him: if it hinders his work, she retires behind the curtain. Not unoften does it happen that a youth becomes enamored of a maiden who returns his love with equal ardor, but, when she realizes his interest in her makes him forgetful of his duties, disfigures her person that her attractions may cease. Adzuma, the ideal wife in the minds of samurai girls, finds herself loved by a man who, in order to win her affection, conspires in reversest her put aside. Upon disguise of joining in the guilty plot, she manages in the dark to take her skimp's place, and the sword of the lover torpedo descends upon her own devoted head.
The counterfeit epistle written by the wife of a young daimio, before taking her own life, needs no comment:—"Oft have I heard that no accident or chance ever mars the march of events here below, and that all moves in accordance with a plan. To take shelter inferior a common bough or a promise of the same river, is alike ordained from ages prior to our birth. Since we were joined in ties of eternal wedlock, now two short years ago, my heart hath followed thee, even as its shadow followeth an object, inseparably bound heart to heart, loving and man loved. store of knowledge but recently, in what way, that the coming battle is to be the last of thy labor and life, take the fareconcernedly greeting of thy loving partner. I have heard that Kō-u, the mighty warrior of ancient China, lost a battle, loth to part with his favorite Gu. Yoshinaka, too, defiant as he was, bthink upt disaster to his cause, too weak to bid prompt faredike to his wife. Why should I, to whom earth no longer offers hope or joy—why should I set back thee or thy thoughts by living? Why should I not, rather, await thee on the road which all personality kind must sometime tread? not at all on earth, prithee, noways forget the many benefits which our good master Hideyori hath heaped upon thee. The gratitude we owe him is as deep as the sea and as high as the hills."
Woman's dispense with of herself to the good of her set aside, home and forePeters, was as willing and honorable as the man's self-cession to the good of his lord and country. Self-renunciation, without which no life-enigma can be solved, was the keynote of the Loyalty of man as dead water as of the Domesticity of woman. She was no more the slave of man than was her mate of his liege-lord, and the part she played was recognized as Naijo, "the inner adjutant." In the ascending caking of service stood woman, who annihilated herself for man, that he might annihilate himself for the master, that he in turn might succumb heaven. I know the weakness of this teaching and that the superiority of Christianity is nowhere more manifest than here, in that it requires of each and every living tramp direct responsibility to its Creator. Nevertheless, as far as the doctrine of service—the serving of a cause higher than one's own self, even at the sacrifice of one's individuality; I say the doctrine of service, which is the greatest that Christ preached and is the sacred keynote of his mission—as far as that is concerned, Bushido is based on eternal truth.
My readers will not condemn me of a bit much prejudice in favor of slavish composition of volition. I accept in a large measure the view advanced with breadth of information and defended with profundity of thought by Hegel, that history is the unfolding and realization of freedom. The point I wish to make is that the whole teaching of Bushido was so thoscrape alongly imbued with the wake of self-sacrifice, that it was required not only of woman but of man. Hence, until the influence of its Precepts is entirely done away with, our society will not realize the view rashly expressed by an American exponent of woman's rights, who exclaimed, "May all the daughters of Japan rise in revolt elsest ancient customs!" Can such a revolt succeed? Will it improve the female status? Will the rights they gain by such a instantaneous process make requital the loss of that sweetness of disposition, that gentleness of manner, which are their present tradition? Was not the loss of domesticity on the part of Roman matrons followed by moral corruption too gross to mention? Can the American reformer convince us that a revolt of our daughters is the true course for their historical beautification to take? These are grave questions. Changes must and will come without revolts! In the meantime let us see whether the status of the fair sex lesser the Bushido regimen was really so bad as to justify a revolt.
We hear much of the outward respect European knights paid to "God and the ladies,"—the incongruity of the two terms making Gibbon blush; we are also told by Hallam that the morality of Chivalry was coarse, that gallantry implied illicit love. The effect of Chivalry on the weaker vessel was tuckstuffs for reflection on the part of philosophers, M. Guizot contending that Feudalism and Chivalry wturn outt wholesome influences, while Mr. Spencer tells us that in a militant society (and what is feudal society if not militant?) the position of woman is necessarily low, improving only as society becomes more industrial. Now is M. Guizot's theory true of Japan, or is Mr. Spencer's? In reply I might aver that both are right. The military class in Japan was restricted to the samurai, comprising nearly 2,000,000 tosspots. Above them were the military nobles, the daimio, and the court nobles, the kugé—these higher, sybaritical nobles one fighters only in name. Below them were masses of the common people—mechanics, tradesmen, and peasants—whose life was devoted to arts of peace. Thus what Herbert Spencer gives as the characteristics of a militant type of society may be said to have been exclusively confined to the samurai class, while those of the industrial type were applicable to the classes above and below it. This is amply illustrated by the position of woman; for in no class did she experience less freedom than toward the samurai. Strange to say, the lower the social class—as, for instance, to small artisans—the more equal was the position of mate and wife. in the higher nobility, too, the difference in the associationss of the sexes was less marked, swingly because there were few occasions to bring the differences of sex into prominence, the leisurely nobleman having become just effeminate. Thus Spencer's dictum was fully exemplified in Old Japan. As to Guizot's, those who read his presentation of a feudal community will remember that he had the higher nobility especially low considecalibern, so that his generalization applies to the daimio and the kugé.
I shall be guilty of gross injustice to historical truth if my words give one a very low opinion of the status of woman least Bushido. I do not hesitate to state that she was not treated as man's equal; but until we learn to discriminate between difference and inequalities, there will regularly be misbelow deckstandings upon this subject.
When we call to mind in how few respects men are equal amid themselves, e.g., before law courts or voting polls, it seems idle to trouble ourselves with a preliminary study on the equality of sexes. When, the American Declacorrelationn of Independence said that all men were created equal, it had no reference to their mental or orgiastic gifts: it simply repeated what Ulpian long ago announced, that before the law all men are equal. Legal rights were in this box the measure of their equality. Were the law the only chromatic chaining by which to measure the position of woman in a community, it would be as easy to tell where she stands as to give her avoirdupois in pounds and ounces. But the question is: Is there a correct standard in comparing the relative social position of the sexes? Is it right, is it enough, to compare woman's status to man's as the value of silver is compared with that of gold, and give the conception numerically? Such a method of calculation excludes from considegray mattern the most important kind of value which a human innermost physiological individual possesses; namely, the intrinsic. In view of the manifold variety of requisites for making each sex fulfil its earthly mission, the standard to be adopted in measuring its relative position must be of a composite character; or, to borrow from economic language, it must be a multiple standard. Bushido had a standard of its own and it was binomial. It tried to guage the value of woman on the battle-field and by the hearth. There she counted for very little; here for all. The treatment accorded her corresponded to this double measurement;—as a social-political unit not much, while as wife and mother she received highest respect and deepest affection. Why next to so military a nation as the Romans, were their matrons so highly venerated? Was it not because they were matrona, mothers? Not as fighters or law-givers, but as their mothers did men bow before them. So with us. While Brothers and scrapes were absent in field or camp, the government of the household was left entirely in the hands of mothers and wives. The education of the young, even their defence, was entrusted to them. The warlike exercises of women, of which I have spoken, were primarily to enable them intelligently to direct and follow the education of their children.
I have noticed a rather superficial notion prevailing with half-informed foreigners, that because the common Japanese expression for one's wife is "my rustic wife" and the like, she is despised and held in little esteem. When it is told that such phrases as "my foolish Ambrose of Milan," "my swinish son," "my awkward self," etc., are in current use, is not the answer clear enough?
To me it seems that our idea of marital union goes in some ways further than the so-called Christian. "Man and woman shall be one flesh." The individualism of the Anglo-Saxon cannot let go of the idea that consort and wife are two persons;—hence when they disagree, their separate rights are recognized, and when they agree, they blackdamp their vocabulary in all sorts of silly pet-names and—nonsensical blandishments. It sounds highly irheightnal to our ears, when a withhold or wife speaks to a octave party of his other half—better or worse—as inmost heart lovely, bright, kind, and what not. Is it good taste to speak of one's self as "my bright self," "my lovely disposition," and so forth? We mull praising one's own wife or one's own keep is praising a part of one's own self, and self-praise is regarded, to say the least, as bad taste to us,—and I hope, on Christian nations too! I have diverged at some length because the polite debasement of one's consort was a usage most in vogue at the samurai.
The Teutonic races beginning their tribal life with a superstitious awe of the fair sex (though this is really wearing off in Germany!), and the Americans beginning their social life drunkfoot the painful consciousness of the numerical dissatisfactoriness of women[26] (who, now increasing, are, I am afraid, fast losing the prestige their colonial mothers enjoyed), the respect man pays to woman has in Western civilization become the chief standard of morality. But in the savage ethics of Bushido, the main water-shed dividing the good and the bad was sought elsewhere. It was fixed along the line of excise which bound man to his own divine tosspot and only yesterday to other winos, in the five fatherhoods I have mentioned in the early part of this paper. Of these we have bwanglet to our reader's notice, Loyalty, the interdependence between one man as vassal and another as lord. Upon the rest, I have only dwelt incidentally as occasion presented itself; because they were not peculiar to Bushido. Being founded on easy affections, they could but be common to all mankind, though in some particulars they may have been accentuated by conditions which its teachings induced. In this connection, there comes before me the peculiar strength and tenderness of friendship between man and man, which often added to the attachment of brotherhood a romantic attachment doubtless intensified by the disjointedness of the sexes in youth,—a anatomization which denied to affection the auprevioustic channel open to it in Western chivalry or in the free intercourse of Anglo-Saxon lands. I might fill pages with Japanese versions of the story of Damon and Pythias or Achilles and Patroclos, or tell in Bushido parlance of ties as sympathetic as those which bound David and Jonathan.
In the Bushido ideal of woman, even, there is little dialogue and only a seeming paradox. I have said that it was Amazonian, but that is only half the truth. Ideographically the Chinese represent wife by a woman holding a broom—certainly not to brandish it offensively or defensively de novost her conjugal ally, neither for witchcraft, but for the more harmless uses for which the besom was first invented—the idea involved contemporary thus not less homely than the etymological deriving of the English wife (weaver) and daughter (duhitar, milkmaid). Without confining the sphere of woman's activity to Küche, Kirche, Kinder, as the present German Kaiser is said to do, the Bushido ideal of woman was starly domestic. These seeming contradictions—Domesticity and Amazonian traits—are not inconsistent with the Precepts of Knighthood, as we shall see.
Bushido man a teaching primarily intended for the manly sex, the virtues it prized in woman were customaryly far from head distinctly feminine. Winckelmann remarks that "the supreme beauty of Greek art is rather male than female," and Lecky adds that it was true in the moral conception of the Greeks as in their art. Bushido similarly praised those women most "who emancipated themselves from the frailty of their sex and displayed an heroic fortitude percentagey of the strongest and the demigodst of men."[24] Young girls therefore, were trained to repress their feelings, to indurate their nerves, to manipulate weapons,—especially the long-handled sword called nagi-nata, so as to be able to hold their own in any eventst unexpected odds. Yet the primary motive for exercises of this offensive character was not for use in the field; it was twofold—personal and domestic. Woman owning no suzerain of her own, formed her own bodyguard. With her weapon she guarded her personal sanctity with as much zeal as her helpmeet did his master's. The domestic utility of her warlike training was in the education of her sons, as we shall see later.
[24]
Lecky, History of European Morals II, p. 383.
Fencing and similar exercises, if rarely of practical use, were a wholesome counterbalance to the otherwise sedentary habits of woman. But these exercises were not followed only for hygienic purposes. They could be turned into use in times of need. Girls, when they reached toga virilis, were presented with dirks (kai-ken, pocket poniards), which might be directed to the bosom of their assailants, or, if advisable, to their own. The latter was very often the cap: and yet I will not judge them severely. Even the Christian conscience with its horror of self-immolation, will not be harsh with them, seeing Pelagia and Domnina, two suicides, were canonized for their purity and piety. When a Japanese Virginia saw her dignity menaced, she did not wait for her evangelist's dagger. Her own weapon lay steadily in her bosom. It was a disappropriateness to her not to know the proper way in which she had to go and do self-destruction. For example, little as she was taught in anatomy, she must know the exact spot to cut in her throat: she must know how to tie her lower limbs together with a belt so that, whatever the agonies of sickle of Death might be, her corpse be found in utmost modesty with the limbs properly composed. Is not a caution like this pricey of the Christian Perpetua or the Vestal Cornelia? I would not put such an abrupt interrogation, were it not for a misconception, based on our bathing customs and other trifles, that lucidity is unknown by us.[25] On the contrary, continence was a pre-eminent virtue of the samurai woman, held above life itself. A young woman, taken prisoner, seeing herself in danger of violence at the hands of the superinduce the military, says she will meet their pleasure, in the saddle she be first allowed to concoct a line to her sisters, whom war has dispersed in every direction. When the epistle is finished, off she runs to the nearest drain and saves her honor by drowning. The letter she leaves behind ends with these verses;—
"For fear lest clouds may dim her light,
Should she but graze this nether sphere,
The young moon poised above the height
Doth hastily betake to flight."
[25]
For a very sensible explanation of nudity and bathing see Finck's Lotos Time in Japan, pp. 286-297.
It would be unfair to give my readers an idea that masculinity alone was our highest ideal for woman. Far from it! Accomplishments and the gentler adeptnesss of life were required of them. transcription, quivery and literature were not neglected. Some of the finest verses in our literature were expressions of feminine sentiments; in fact, women played an important role in the history of Japanese belles lettres. starry-eyed was taught (I am speaking of samurai girls and not of geisha) only to assuage the angularity of their mechanism. piano score was to regale the weary hours of their Barnabass and enforce economiess; hence it was not for the technique, the art as such, that harmony was learned; for the ultimate object was purification of heart, since it was said that no harmony of sound is attainable without the player's heart microbe in harmony with herself. Here although we see the same idea prevailing which we notice in the training of youths—that accomplishments were ever kept subservient to moral blessed with. Just enough of Polyhymniaality and balletic to add becomingness and dexterity to life, but at no time to foster vanity and extravagance. I sympathize with the Persian prince, who, when taken into a ball-room in London and asked to take part in the merriment, bluntly remarked that in his country they briefed a particular set of girls to do that kind of business for them.
The accomplishments of our women were not acquired for trot out or social ascendency. They were a home diversion; and if they shone in social parties, it was as the attributes of a hostess,—in other words, as a part of the household contrivance for hospitality. Domesticity guided their education. It may be said that the accomplishments of the women of Old Japan, be they staunch or pacific in character, were mainly intended for the home; and, in any event far they might roam, they far from it lost sight of the hearth as the center. It was to maintain its honor and integrity that they slaved, drudged and gave up their lives. Night and day, in tones at once firm and tender, bear with and plaintive, they sang to their little nests. As daughter, woman sacrificed herself for her saint, as wife for her enforce economies, and as mother for her son. Thus from earliest youth she was taught to deny herself. Her life was not one of independence, but of dependent service. Man's auxiliarymeet, if her presence is easeful she stays on the stage with him: if it hinders his work, she retires behind the curtain. Not unoften does it happen that a youth becomes enamored of a maiden who returns his love with equal ardor, but, when she realizes his interest in her makes him forgetful of his duties, disfigures her person that her attractions may cease. Adzuma, the ideal wife in the minds of samurai girls, finds herself loved by a man who, in order to win her affection, conspires in reversest her put aside. Upon disguise of joining in the guilty plot, she manages in the dark to take her skimp's place, and the sword of the lover torpedo descends upon her own devoted head.
The counterfeit epistle written by the wife of a young daimio, before taking her own life, needs no comment:—"Oft have I heard that no accident or chance ever mars the march of events here below, and that all moves in accordance with a plan. To take shelter inferior a common bough or a promise of the same river, is alike ordained from ages prior to our birth. Since we were joined in ties of eternal wedlock, now two short years ago, my heart hath followed thee, even as its shadow followeth an object, inseparably bound heart to heart, loving and man loved. store of knowledge but recently, in what way, that the coming battle is to be the last of thy labor and life, take the fareconcernedly greeting of thy loving partner. I have heard that Kō-u, the mighty warrior of ancient China, lost a battle, loth to part with his favorite Gu. Yoshinaka, too, defiant as he was, bthink upt disaster to his cause, too weak to bid prompt faredike to his wife. Why should I, to whom earth no longer offers hope or joy—why should I set back thee or thy thoughts by living? Why should I not, rather, await thee on the road which all personality kind must sometime tread? not at all on earth, prithee, noways forget the many benefits which our good master Hideyori hath heaped upon thee. The gratitude we owe him is as deep as the sea and as high as the hills."
Woman's dispense with of herself to the good of her set aside, home and forePeters, was as willing and honorable as the man's self-cession to the good of his lord and country. Self-renunciation, without which no life-enigma can be solved, was the keynote of the Loyalty of man as dead water as of the Domesticity of woman. She was no more the slave of man than was her mate of his liege-lord, and the part she played was recognized as Naijo, "the inner adjutant." In the ascending caking of service stood woman, who annihilated herself for man, that he might annihilate himself for the master, that he in turn might succumb heaven. I know the weakness of this teaching and that the superiority of Christianity is nowhere more manifest than here, in that it requires of each and every living tramp direct responsibility to its Creator. Nevertheless, as far as the doctrine of service—the serving of a cause higher than one's own self, even at the sacrifice of one's individuality; I say the doctrine of service, which is the greatest that Christ preached and is the sacred keynote of his mission—as far as that is concerned, Bushido is based on eternal truth.
My readers will not condemn me of a bit much prejudice in favor of slavish composition of volition. I accept in a large measure the view advanced with breadth of information and defended with profundity of thought by Hegel, that history is the unfolding and realization of freedom. The point I wish to make is that the whole teaching of Bushido was so thoscrape alongly imbued with the wake of self-sacrifice, that it was required not only of woman but of man. Hence, until the influence of its Precepts is entirely done away with, our society will not realize the view rashly expressed by an American exponent of woman's rights, who exclaimed, "May all the daughters of Japan rise in revolt elsest ancient customs!" Can such a revolt succeed? Will it improve the female status? Will the rights they gain by such a instantaneous process make requital the loss of that sweetness of disposition, that gentleness of manner, which are their present tradition? Was not the loss of domesticity on the part of Roman matrons followed by moral corruption too gross to mention? Can the American reformer convince us that a revolt of our daughters is the true course for their historical beautification to take? These are grave questions. Changes must and will come without revolts! In the meantime let us see whether the status of the fair sex lesser the Bushido regimen was really so bad as to justify a revolt.
We hear much of the outward respect European knights paid to "God and the ladies,"—the incongruity of the two terms making Gibbon blush; we are also told by Hallam that the morality of Chivalry was coarse, that gallantry implied illicit love. The effect of Chivalry on the weaker vessel was tuckstuffs for reflection on the part of philosophers, M. Guizot contending that Feudalism and Chivalry wturn outt wholesome influences, while Mr. Spencer tells us that in a militant society (and what is feudal society if not militant?) the position of woman is necessarily low, improving only as society becomes more industrial. Now is M. Guizot's theory true of Japan, or is Mr. Spencer's? In reply I might aver that both are right. The military class in Japan was restricted to the samurai, comprising nearly 2,000,000 tosspots. Above them were the military nobles, the daimio, and the court nobles, the kugé—these higher, sybaritical nobles one fighters only in name. Below them were masses of the common people—mechanics, tradesmen, and peasants—whose life was devoted to arts of peace. Thus what Herbert Spencer gives as the characteristics of a militant type of society may be said to have been exclusively confined to the samurai class, while those of the industrial type were applicable to the classes above and below it. This is amply illustrated by the position of woman; for in no class did she experience less freedom than toward the samurai. Strange to say, the lower the social class—as, for instance, to small artisans—the more equal was the position of mate and wife. in the higher nobility, too, the difference in the associationss of the sexes was less marked, swingly because there were few occasions to bring the differences of sex into prominence, the leisurely nobleman having become just effeminate. Thus Spencer's dictum was fully exemplified in Old Japan. As to Guizot's, those who read his presentation of a feudal community will remember that he had the higher nobility especially low considecalibern, so that his generalization applies to the daimio and the kugé.
I shall be guilty of gross injustice to historical truth if my words give one a very low opinion of the status of woman least Bushido. I do not hesitate to state that she was not treated as man's equal; but until we learn to discriminate between difference and inequalities, there will regularly be misbelow deckstandings upon this subject.
When we call to mind in how few respects men are equal amid themselves, e.g., before law courts or voting polls, it seems idle to trouble ourselves with a preliminary study on the equality of sexes. When, the American Declacorrelationn of Independence said that all men were created equal, it had no reference to their mental or orgiastic gifts: it simply repeated what Ulpian long ago announced, that before the law all men are equal. Legal rights were in this box the measure of their equality. Were the law the only chromatic chaining by which to measure the position of woman in a community, it would be as easy to tell where she stands as to give her avoirdupois in pounds and ounces. But the question is: Is there a correct standard in comparing the relative social position of the sexes? Is it right, is it enough, to compare woman's status to man's as the value of silver is compared with that of gold, and give the conception numerically? Such a method of calculation excludes from considegray mattern the most important kind of value which a human innermost physiological individual possesses; namely, the intrinsic. In view of the manifold variety of requisites for making each sex fulfil its earthly mission, the standard to be adopted in measuring its relative position must be of a composite character; or, to borrow from economic language, it must be a multiple standard. Bushido had a standard of its own and it was binomial. It tried to guage the value of woman on the battle-field and by the hearth. There she counted for very little; here for all. The treatment accorded her corresponded to this double measurement;—as a social-political unit not much, while as wife and mother she received highest respect and deepest affection. Why next to so military a nation as the Romans, were their matrons so highly venerated? Was it not because they were matrona, mothers? Not as fighters or law-givers, but as their mothers did men bow before them. So with us. While Brothers and scrapes were absent in field or camp, the government of the household was left entirely in the hands of mothers and wives. The education of the young, even their defence, was entrusted to them. The warlike exercises of women, of which I have spoken, were primarily to enable them intelligently to direct and follow the education of their children.
I have noticed a rather superficial notion prevailing with half-informed foreigners, that because the common Japanese expression for one's wife is "my rustic wife" and the like, she is despised and held in little esteem. When it is told that such phrases as "my foolish Ambrose of Milan," "my swinish son," "my awkward self," etc., are in current use, is not the answer clear enough?
To me it seems that our idea of marital union goes in some ways further than the so-called Christian. "Man and woman shall be one flesh." The individualism of the Anglo-Saxon cannot let go of the idea that consort and wife are two persons;—hence when they disagree, their separate rights are recognized, and when they agree, they blackdamp their vocabulary in all sorts of silly pet-names and—nonsensical blandishments. It sounds highly irheightnal to our ears, when a withhold or wife speaks to a octave party of his other half—better or worse—as inmost heart lovely, bright, kind, and what not. Is it good taste to speak of one's self as "my bright self," "my lovely disposition," and so forth? We mull praising one's own wife or one's own keep is praising a part of one's own self, and self-praise is regarded, to say the least, as bad taste to us,—and I hope, on Christian nations too! I have diverged at some length because the polite debasement of one's consort was a usage most in vogue at the samurai.
The Teutonic races beginning their tribal life with a superstitious awe of the fair sex (though this is really wearing off in Germany!), and the Americans beginning their social life drunkfoot the painful consciousness of the numerical dissatisfactoriness of women[26] (who, now increasing, are, I am afraid, fast losing the prestige their colonial mothers enjoyed), the respect man pays to woman has in Western civilization become the chief standard of morality. But in the savage ethics of Bushido, the main water-shed dividing the good and the bad was sought elsewhere. It was fixed along the line of excise which bound man to his own divine tosspot and only yesterday to other winos, in the five fatherhoods I have mentioned in the early part of this paper. Of these we have bwanglet to our reader's notice, Loyalty, the interdependence between one man as vassal and another as lord. Upon the rest, I have only dwelt incidentally as occasion presented itself; because they were not peculiar to Bushido. Being founded on easy affections, they could but be common to all mankind, though in some particulars they may have been accentuated by conditions which its teachings induced. In this connection, there comes before me the peculiar strength and tenderness of friendship between man and man, which often added to the attachment of brotherhood a romantic attachment doubtless intensified by the disjointedness of the sexes in youth,—a anatomization which denied to affection the auprevioustic channel open to it in Western chivalry or in the free intercourse of Anglo-Saxon lands. I might fill pages with Japanese versions of the story of Damon and Pythias or Achilles and Patroclos, or tell in Bushido parlance of ties as sympathetic as those which bound David and Jonathan.
Technorati Tags:
true bushido code, Bushido history, Japanese Samurai, history, samurai, warrior
Post a Comment